Daniel Ellsberg Publicly Supports Edward Snowden

 

 Daniel Ellsberg Time Cover, back in the day

Did we all see the Op-Ed piece in Sunday's Washington Post by Daniel Ellsberg?  Well, if you haven't read it, you should, and just in case you are one of the few people on the planet who has not heard of Ellsberg (because Snowden is constantly being compared to him), let someone who is old enough to remember Nixon and Watergate and the Viet Nam War tell you that he was some kind of hero.   I'm impressed that Ellsberg spoke out in favor of Snowden.  Here's a quote:

Many people compare Edward Snowden to me unfavorably for leaving the country and seeking asylum, rather than facing trial as I did. I don’t agree. The country I stayed in was a different America, a long time ago.
After the New York Times had been enjoined from publishing the Pentagon Papers — on June 15, 1971, the first prior restraint on a newspaper in U.S. history — and I had given another copy to The Post (which would also be enjoined), I went underground with my wife, Patricia, for 13 days. My purpose (quite like Snowden’s in flying to Hong Kong) was to elude surveillance while I was arranging — with the crucial help of a number of others, still unknown to the FBI — to distribute the Pentagon Papers sequentially to 17 other newspapers, in the face of two more injunctions. The last three days of that period was in defiance of an arrest order: I was, like Snowden now, a “fugitive from justice.”

 Like Snowden, Ellsberg leaked damaging information about how the government lied to the American people.  In 1971  Ellsberg, a former military analyst at the Pentagon,  gave classified information in the form of  " The Pentagon Papers" to  influential news media  and was promptly arrested under the espionage act for doing so.  He too was called a patriot by some and a traitor by others.  The protest against the Viet Nam War was gaining ground at this time and exposing the way the government had lied to the people in order to get Americans to fight this war was fueling public fury.  The government was highly embarrassed by Ellsberg's revelations. He was  charged and put on trial, facing  the possibility of up to 115 years in prison.  In 1973,  during the depths of the  Nixon Administration's Watergate debacle, the trial was suspended and all charges eventually dropped. Oh, and just by chance, guess who had influence and got started in government during the ill fated Nixon Administration?  If you guessed Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney you would be right on the money ( to coin a phrase). Just thought I'd mention it.

There is no question that Edward Snowden has technically broken the law by revealing classified information to the public, but like Daniel Ellsberg, he has done so for patriotic reasons.  The government is trying to paint him as an egotistical high school drop out who somehow got hold of government secrets and who deserves to be punished. I see a tech saavy dedicated young man ready to sacrifice his life to get a much needed conversation about personal privacy vs. government control started. His actions are already having an international effect. Whatever you think of Edward Snowden, he is not the first whistleblower to be relentlessly pursued for embarrassing powerful people. Daniel Ellsberg is only one who went before him.  Three highly placed technical officials at NSA Thomas Drake, William Binney and J. Kirk Wiebe have been trying to public attention to  the NSA and the extent of government surveillance on private citizens since 9/11.

Snowden is following in the footsteps of some very brave  and patriotic people.  He has opened a door to the secret doings of an agency that few of us even knew was there. Like Ellsberg, Binney, and Wiebe before him, he is a man who knows that " sunshine is the best disinfectant"  The " secrets" he is divulging to the public ( not selling to a foreign government)  may end up sparking a very important discussion that can save our democracy in this electronic age.  Only time will tell.

How Edward Snowden Woke Up America, Got the Left and Right to Agree, Screwed the NSA, And the Irony of It All

image credit

Are we all following the narrative of Edward Snowden, super-techie and former CIA computer security wizard?  Depending on who you talk to, he's either a modern day Danial Ellsberg or worse than Benedict Arnold.  Nobody is luke warm, but necessity is making for some very strange bedfellows.  Both liberal Democrats and conservative, small government Libertarians are, ironically, united in their support of Snowden. Geeks and Techi-types  who understand what the rest of us don't are also on the Snowden bandwagon. The majority of rank and file Americans either reflexively revile him as a tattletale or buy the party line that he is a spy and a traitor. One way or another,I think we have all heard of him by now.

Personally, I can't take my eyes off my twitter feed and the TV screen as the action heats up today, even though with  the post election deadlock in Washington, I have sworn off politics, particularly political blogging, as too depressing.  But, this is just too much. It is a fascinating situation worthy of Dan Brown or John Le Carre.  I have to say a few words. There are so many ironies here that I hardly know where to start and I certainly don't know what is going on.

When Edward Snowden made his initial revelations to Glenn Greenwald via The Guardian earlier this month, I was interested but I only really started listening once the reactions started.   On the internet, sentiment among my fellow Democrats was basically pro Snowden. He wasn't peddling miltary secrets to foreign governments.  He was sounding a warning to the world about the scope of American government surveillance out of a sense of moral indignation. He was a GenY activist and collegial idealist trying to improve the world in the time honored American tradition of civil disobedience.   An equally vocal group(including much of the media following what I believe now were government talking points) felt he was a self important petty bureaucrat crying wolf, betraying the country and possessing ulterior motives for making classified information public, not to mention  breaking the law. On the playground of life, nobody likes a tattletale, especially not those being tattled on.

By last week Snowden had gone to ground in Hong Kong  and all the TV talking heads had their marching orders. They were in rare form.   General Alexander, head of the NSA and President Obama and a bunch of others assured us all that nobody was reading our email or listening to our phone calls. They were only collecting something called " metadata" in order to protect us. They patted us on the head and told us not to worry. The metadata they had collected had saved us from 50 terrorist attacks, they said.  Privacy was valued and could not be violated without a court order.

I'm usually not much of a Fox News fan, being liberal and all, but the video below which offers a lot of comment on General Alexander's testimony was quite interesting. Even Fox found the General evasive about what the NSA could and could not do.  At last, an issue both right and left wingers can unite on.

Imagine how shocked I was when I found out  about the scope and the very real dangers of government surveillance. There was no mistake.  The powers that be had lied. First I saw a video of a roundtable done by USA today featuring three former NSA employees who have been trying for years to go through channels to blow the whistle on the agency's  un-constitutional activities. These are highly trained computer scientists, not low level people.William Binney worked for NSA for  30 years,eventually becoming the technical director of the of the world geopolitical and military analysis and reporting group. He was pressured to retire in 2001, but he never stopped talking and trying to get somebody to pay attention.

All three men support Edward Snowden and say he was able to do what they wanted to do. i.e. let the American people and the world know just how much secret government spying is going on.  Please watch the video.  It shook my tree and I hope it makes you ask some questions as well.

Next  I read an article in The Guardian by James Naughton that explained it all to a non technical, liberal arts major,like me.   He explained why "metadata" was not innocuous.  Indeed, it is how you or I could end up on a "no fly" list or indeed even a secret kill list by mistake and never know about it.  It is the stuff that databases are made of.  It is about patterns and mathematics not people. And this is how the government can go back and assemble anything it wants about you anytime.  Here's a quote: Please follow the link above to read the entire article. It is very enlightening.

... Of course there's no content involved, for the simple reason that content is a pain in the butt from the point of view of modern surveillance. First, you have to listen to the damned recordings, and that requires people (because even today, computers are not great at understanding everyday conversation) and time. And although Senator Feinstein let slip that the FBI already employs 10,000 people "doing intelligence on counter-terrorism", even that Stasi-scale mob isn't a match for the torrent of voice recordings that Verizon and co could cough up daily for the spooks.

So in this business at least, content isn't king. It's the metadata – the call logs showing who called whom, from which location and for how long – that you want. Why? Because that's the stuff that is machine-readable, and therefore searchable.

Then came today and a whole new raft of Sunday talk shows.  Edward Snowden left HongKong in the spotlight. He sure knows how to take advantage of a slow news day.  He hopped a plane for Moscow while Hong Kong authorities did the Pontius Pilate thing and washed their hands of the whole affair via a CYA press release.The release went viral on the internet as it gave Washington a very polite, diplomatic middle finger salute.

 Then came the bombshell. Snowden was headed for Moscow.  You could hear them screaming in Washington. As I write he is bedded down in the airport in Moscow, ready to leave for Ecuador in the morning.  Let's see what happens.  He also , I am told, has four laptops full of official secrets in his possession. He's a valuable commodity.  Uneasy lies the head etc. etc. I bet there is a whole lot of scrambling going on in the Kremlin.

Now here is another irony. Snowden, the champion of freedom and government transparency, is being aided by Moscow to get to Ecuador. Let's see, the freedom fighter has been helped by two totalitarian, communist countries, China and Russia, and is going to Ecuador, countries not exactly noted for their positive human rights policies or their open governments. How ironic is that?  You just can't make this stuff up.

Meanwhile, President Obama' s approval rating is tanking. Left, right and center are all displeased with him.  Libertarian Senator Rand Paul is hailing Snowden as a hero and criticizing Obama. New York Senator Chuck Schumer thinks Snowden is a traitor and is furious at Obama.This issue could really be a tipping point for the administration.  Welcome to your second term, Mr. Obama.  Enjoy the ride.

Me?  I think that attempting to corral and control internet transparency is futile. In the long run it just won't work. The old paradigm is over. It's the 21st century. I'm not sure what I think of Edward Snowden, but I know that he has started a conversation that needs to be had, not just in the United States, but all over the world.  I think charging him with espionage is ridiculous. He's not selling secrets to foreign governments.  He's telling the world what it needs to know. Something for which he is likely to suffer greatly in the end.   I know it won't happen, but I think we should  just say thank you and deal with it.